Introduction to Terrorism Essay Example for Free

Introduction to Terrorism Essay The paper would analyze the definitions for terrorism proposed by some authors deeply along with criticizing them and proposing a global definition of terrorism. Secondly, â€Å"the concept of ‘just war theory’ would also be evaluated by highlighting its limitations. And finally, just war theory concept would be applied on the recent military action in Afghanistan, whether it fits the scenario or not. Answer -1 There are hundreds of definitions of terrorism defined by many authors, journalists, and politicians. But the problem is that the idea or concept of what terrorism actually is, is vague and not perceived globally as a single concept. The definition proposed by Lawless revolves around three key words; violence political purpose, and non-state actor. It goes this way, â€Å"the unlawful threat or act of violence committed for a political purpose by a non-state actor† (Lawless, 2007). This definition seems to be quite rigid and inflexible because it says that terrorism happens only because of political purposes by the non-state actors. In fact, terrorism does not always take place due to political purposes; for instance, these days, countries themselves want to get rid of terrorism that is overwhelming them and worsening their relationships with other countries. There is no doubt that non-state actors are mostly involved in terrorism, but they usually do so for purposes such as, smuggling, harassing the legal authorities who try to resist them, and certain mafias or groups who want to take revenge of any injustice done to them before or being done. Secondly, the definition does not highlight the idea about the innocent people or victims. Terrorism for political purposes means that riots or revenges are taken for their own sake, purpose, and benefit. The global definition that I propose is that ‘any unlawful or illegal act done to hurt, damage, or overwhelm the party who is innocent and was not involved in any conspiracy or threatening act against the party who is hurting them’. See more: introduction paragraph example Answer – 2 Just war theory proposes the idea that lies between permissivism and pacifism. Permissivism suggests using arms as many as wanted and as the way the armed forces want to; whereas, pacifism says not to use arms against civilians or innocent people but to kill those who deserve to be killed. Therefore, just war theory says that war must be fought when it is fair or when there is a reason to be fought with the enemies or for a legitimate cause (Wilson, 2006). There are certain limitations of this theory such as, it does not define what a ‘legitimate’ cause actually is and when is it just or fair to attack the enemy (mtholyoke.edu, n.d). Therefore, countries or parties always think of their own interest and consider their cause as a legitimate one and considerable to attack the enemy, even they may be wrong at their side. Moreover, not killing civilians is just a saying; armed forces often kill and harass the civilians such as, kidnapping them, and smuggling them, etc. So, f rom here, the desire to take revenge arises in the other party and the issue never resolves, in fact it goes on. I think the idea of just war theory must be reconceptualized. Answer – 3 The recent military action against Afghanistan does not fit on the concept of just war theory because the American started the raid against them without having solid evidence against them. Moreover, they did not only killed the Afghan terrorists, but also took lives of thousands of innocent people including children, women, and aged ones. They brutally destroyed their houses, properties, lands, lives, and everything.

Importance of Play in Children Development

Importance of Play in Children Development Play is special. Not only is it fun, but it is very important to childrens development. Play is one of the most important means by which children learn. Through natural activity they create roles that imitate adult behavior. Children think, create, imagine, communicate, make choices, solve problems, take risks, build physical skills and take on a variety of roles as they interact socially. Play is essentially motivating and offers children the freedom to explore an activity tolerant by adult parameters of measured outcomes, testing and accountability. Play supports learning, promotes language and social development and enhances creativity in children and adults. Children who learn healthy play skills feel capable, have successes, make friends and learn non-violent ways to interact with others. Children learn more efficiently and effectively through play than one can imagine. The beauty of this learning and growing time is that the motivation for a young child to do it is already ther e-its enjoyable. The Development of Play The surreptitious to helping young children succeed, is to keep the spirit of creativity and of playful learning alive and active. Childrens learning is a mixture of their own deep inner force to grow and learn attached with their imitation of the adults in their environment. An important milestone in play, the capacity for make-believe play also known as fantasy play occurs at around two and a half or three years of age. Before that, children are more oriented to the real world: their own bodies, simple household objects like pots, pans, and wooden spoons, and simple toys like dolls, trucks, and balls. Toddlers imitate what they see around them; common play themes include cooking, caring for baby, driving cars or trucks, and other everyday events. These themes continue and develop after age three, but now children are less dependent on real objects and create what they need from anything that is at hand. Their ability to enter into make-believe allows them to transform a simple object into a play prop. The three-year-old becomes so engaged in make-believe play that objects seem to be in a regular state of transformation. No play episode is ever finished; it is always in the process of becoming something else. The playful three-year-old often leaves a trail of objects as her play evolves from one theme to the next. In contrast, four-year-olds are generally more stationary and thematic in their play. They like to have a house to play in, which might also be a ship or a shop, and many enter the pack-rat stage where they fill their houses with objects so that it seems they cannot freely move around. This does not bother them at all, however. Like three-year olds, they are inspired in the moment by the objects before them. They are quite spontaneous in their ideas for play. The fantasy play of the five-year old is characterized by the ability to have an idea and then play it out rather than being encouraged in the moment by the object at hand as is the case with three and four year olds. Often, five-year olds will say what they want to play as they enter the kindergarten. There is one more important aspect to the development of make-believe plays that usually does not occur until children are six years old. At this age they will often play out a situation without the use of props. They may build a house but leave it unfurnished, then sit inside it and talk through their play, for now they are able to see the images clearly in their minds eyes. This stage can be described as imaginative play, for the children now have the capacity to form a well expressed inner image. In all of these stages of dramatic play children may play alone or with others. However, the way children engage in social play with others changes over the years. The one year old tends to play alone, while social play of two year-olds is generally called parallel play for young children play side by side without fully interacting with each other. The children enjoy playing with each other, but generally they are not deeply invested in each other. They enjoy playing together when they are in nursery school, but tend to forget about each other when they are apart. The social play of five and six year olds is different. The doors to deeper social relationships are opening for them. They form friendships and talk about their friends at home. They think about their friends when they are apart. They may want to call them on the phone or visit in their homes. Rationale for Play Informal play settings allow children to practice language skills involving vocabulary, syntax and grammar. English language learners particularly benefit from language interactions during play. These language skills later assist with reading, writing and math development. All the processes involved in plays such as repeating actions, making connections, extending skills, combining materials and taking risks provide the essential electrical impulses to help make connections and interconnections between neural networks, thus extending childrens capabilities as learners, thinkers and communicators. Physical: Play is an integral part of the growth of a healthy child. lt fosters opportunities to develop large and small motor skills as well as coordination, balance and muscle tone. Active Movement provides an outlet for children to release energy and challenges their developing physical bodies. The ancient Greeks recognised the value of play in the developmental and growth period of childhood. Experts in todays world of education also believe that play is essential. Social: Educators know children learn best in situations that are non-threatening, flexible and fun. Self-selected play joins children of like interests in situations where they can engage in self-directed conversations. Creating opportunities for play can lower stress and help prevent violence by offering safe and acceptable situations for interaction. In the early childhood classroom most students engage in age-appropriate conversation with their peers. Shared interests encourage them to pay attention to others, ask questions, offer help, make suggestions and provide feedback. Intellectual: Children benefit greatly when they are occupied in interactive play and are free to share their k knowledge with other children. Curriculum is more effective when presented with materials that are open-ended can be easily manipulated. Through spontaneous and creative play with a minimum of teacher intervention children are free to grow and manifest their understanding of concepts. Emotional During play children are able to control situations that are not theirs in the real world. By exploring possibilities in play situations, children display confidence and competence as they plan and make decisions. Play provides a place where children can act out feelings about difficult emotional events they may face. Vygotsky believed that children involved in imaginative play will renounce what they want, and willingly subordinate themselves to rules in order to gain the pleasure of the play. He argues that in play they exercise their greatest self-control. ln a Vygotskian model, if we accept the distinction between play as such and play in schools we can see that in order for play to be valued it needs to be located securely within the curriculum structure and organizational framework. Clarifying the role of adults in this process is, therefore, essential. Stages of Play Play is spontaneous, observables, solitary or parallel, associative, symbolic and cooperative. Positive unrestricted play can be a joyous activity that reaps many rewards. Children generally play by building on their previous experiences. They may engage in any of the different types of play at any time. When children are in a healthy environment, they progress through each stage at their own level of development. . Unoccupied Play. Children learn by observing others without interaction. . Onlookers. Children focus intently on watching others play. They may engage in conversation but do not otherwise participate. . Solitary or independent play. Children play by themselves with no interest in what others are doing even if they are physically close. . Parallel play. Children play alongside others with similar objects such as blocks; however, they do not play with each other but side by side separately. . Associative play. Children engage in the same play activity without an organised goal. They may share blocks or tools but do not build the same structure. . Cooperative Play. Children are organised, have a specific goal and have a sense of belonging to a group. It is the beginning of teamwork and doing projects where they work or play together Conclusion As play disappears from the background of childhood, we need to recognise that its downfall will have a lasting impact. Decades of persuasive research have shown that without play, childrens physical, social, emotional, and intellectual development is compromised. They will develop without much imagination and creativity. Their capacity for communication will be reduced and their affinity towards aggressiveness and violence will increase. In short, human nature as we have known it will be deeply changed, increasing many of the problems that are already afflicting children and society. If we do not invest in play, we will find ourselves investing much more in prisons and hospitals, as the incidence of physical, and mental illness, as well as aggressive and violent behavior increases.

A student on parental effects on education

A student on parental effects on education This chapter gives an overall picture of the design of the study research tools used for the study, nature and selection of the sample, analysis and interpretation of the data in the light of other research studies. Academic achievement is one of the aims of education. A childs academic achievement is highly improved by parent-child relationship. It is also enforced by the nature of the school and teachers, students socio economic status, attitudes, motivation, personality factors, cognitive styles and intelligence which is indulged with the parents. The parent-child relationship is a good key factor for a child to have adjustment in environment and to perform well in academics also. The need for undertaking this research study is to replicate the parent-child relationship and how it enhances the childs adjustment ability. The friendly motivation given to the child enables him/her to empower concentration and boost them to explore in academics. The educational capacity of the student is judged by his achievement in the school. The academic performance in school subjects will lead them to choose the future course of life. In the high school level itself the basic things will be known by the students. This is an important stage not only for studying habits influencing the academic achievement, but also to bear on the whole personality of the school students. The investigator would like to know, Is there any relationship between parents behavior on the childs adjustment and academic achievement of the School students?. The knowledge of the relationship between these variables under study would help the parents and students to make the needed changes. Understanding the relationship between parents behaviour on the childs adjustment and his academic achievement will be of great importance in determining the interrelation between the variables under study. The results of the present study will be useful to understand the fact, whether parent child relationship has greater impact on the childs adjustment and academic outcome of the students. The findings can be utilized in the field of education to develop remedial measures, favorable relationship between the parent and the child which in turn will help the high school students. As a result healthier school community, society and the nation will be formed. The prime focus of this project was to examine developmental changes in parent-child relationships, and their associations with child adjustment related to academic achievement of them as students. 3.03 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM The present investigation entitled A study on the effects of parent child relationship on the childs adjustment and academic achievement has been undertaken keeping in view the importance of explicating the effect of parent-child relationship on childs adjustment and academic achievement of high school students. 3.04 MEANING OF THE PROBLEM In the process of learning, Motivation is the central factor to get a perfect result. Adjustment is the process by which a person tries to strike a balance between his requirements ((i.e.) needs, desires, drives urges) and varying life situations. Adjustment is a continuous process by which a person varies his behaviour to produce more harmonious relationship between himself and his environment. Parents involvement is critical in facilitating childrens development and achievement and in preventing and remedying educational and developmental problems. Substantial evidence exists to show that children whose parents are involved in their schooling have significantly increased their academic achievement and cognitive development. Academic achievement is an important predictor of adjustment and has been associated with several factors such as parenting styles and parental involvement The present study is intended to study the following objectives. 3.05 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 1. To find out the effect of Parent-child relationship, Parent-child adjustment and Academic achievement of students. 2. To find out the significant difference in the mean scores of the a) Gender b) Medium c) Types of School d) Types of management e) Locality 3.06 HYPOTHESES: Based on the objectives of the present study the following hypotheses were framed. 1. Gender does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to their different dimensions of Parent-child relationship. 2. Gender does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to their different dimension of Parent-childs relationship. 3. Gender does not show significant difference between the father-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of childs adjustment. 4. Gender does not show significant difference between the mother-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of child adjustment. 5. Gender does not show significant difference between the childs relationships with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 6. Gender does not signify difference between the childs adjustments with regard to Parent-childs adjustment. 7. Gender does not show significant difference between the Academic Achievement with relation to Parent-childs relationship and Parent-childs Adjustment. 8. Medium of instruction does not show significant difference between the father-child relationships with regard to their different dimension of Parent-childs relationship. 9. Medium of instruction does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to their different dimension of Parent-childs relationship. 10. Medium of instruction does not d show significant difference between the father childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of Parent-childs adjustment. 11. Medium of instruction does not show significant difference between the mother childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of Parent-childs adjustment. 12. Medium of instruction does not show significant difference between the childs relationships with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 13. Medium of instruction does not show significant difference between the childs adjustments with regard to Parent-childs adjustment. 14. Medium of instruction does not show significant difference between the Academic Achievement with relation to Parent-childs Adjustment and Parent-childs relationship. 15. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of protecting behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 16. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Symbolic Punishment Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 17. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Rejecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 18. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Punishment Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 19. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-child relationships with regard to dimension of Demanding Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 20. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-child relationships with regard to dimension of Indifferent Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 21. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-child relationships with regard to dimension of Symbolic Reward Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 22. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-child relationships with regard to dimension of Loving Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 23. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Reward Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 24. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-child relationships with regard to dimension of Neglecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 25. Type of School does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 26. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of protecting behavior of Parent-childs relationship. 27. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Symbolic Punishment Behavior of Parent-childs relationship. 28. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Rejecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 29. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Punishment Behavior of Parent-childs relationship. 30. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Demanding Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 31. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationship with regard to dimension of Indifferent Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 32. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Symbolic Reward Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 33. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Loving Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 34. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Reward Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 35. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Neglecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 36. Type of School does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 37. Type of school does not show significant relationships between the father-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of child adjustment. 38. Type of school does not show significant relationship between the mother-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimensions of Parent-childs adjustment. 39. Type of school does not show significant difference in child relationship with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 40. Type of Schools does not show significant difference between the child adjustments with regard to Parent-childs adjustment. 41. Type of Schools does not show significant relationship between the Academic Achievement with relation to Parent-childs relationship and Parent-childs Adjustment. 42. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of protecting behavior of Parent-childs relationship. 43. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationship with regard to dimension of Symbolic Punishment Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 44. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Rejecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 45. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Punishment Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 46. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Demanding Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 47. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Indifferent Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 48. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Symbolic Reward Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 49. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Loving Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 50. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Reward Behavior of Parent-childs relationship. 51. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Neglecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 52. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 53. Type of Management does not show difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of protecting behavior of Parent-childs relationship. 54. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-child relationships with regard to dimension of Symbolic Punishment Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 55. Type of management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Rejecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 56. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Punishment Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 57. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Demanding Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 58. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Indifferent Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 59. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Symbolic Reward Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 60. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Loving Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 61. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Object Reward Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 62. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to dimension of Neglecting Behaviour of Parent-childs relationship. 63. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 64. Type of Management does not show significant relationship between the father-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of child adjustment. 65. Type of Management does not show significant relationship between the mother-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimensions of Parent-childs adjustment. 66. Type of Management does not show significant difference in child relationship with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 67. Type of Management does not show significant difference between the child adjustments with regard to Parent-childs adjustment. 68. Type of Management does not show significant relationship between the Academic Achievement with related to Parent-childs relationship and Parent-childs Adjustment. 69. Locality does not show significant difference between the father-childs relationships with regard to their different dimension of Parent-childs relationship. 70. Locality does not show significant difference between the mother-childs relationships with regard to their different dimension of Parent-childs relationship. 71. Locality does not show significant difference between the father-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of child adjustment. 72. Locality does not show significant difference between the mother-childs adjustments with regard to their different dimension of child adjustment. 73. Locality does not show significant difference between the child relationships with regard to Parent-childs relationship. 74. Locality does not show significant difference between the child adjustments with regard to Parent-childs adjustment. 75. Locality does not show significant difference between the Academic Achievement with related to Parent-childs relationship and Parent-childs Adjustment. 76. There is no significant association between parent child relationship and parent childs adjustment. 77. There is no significant association between parent childs relationship and academic achievement. 78. There is no significant association between parent childs relationship and academic achievement. 79. There is no Correlation between Parent childs relationship and Parent childs adjustment. 80. There is no Correlation between Parent child relationship and Academic achievement. 81. There is no Correlation between Parent childs adjustment and Academic achievement of students. 3.07 METHOD OF STUDY Survey was made as per the present study among the Standard XII students in high schools of Chennai, Kanchipuram and Thiruvallur districts in Tamil Nadu to identify parent-child relationship, childs adjustment inventory, academic achievement and other related variables. 3.08 VARIABLES OF THE STUDY The variables selected for the present study are given below: 3.08.01 RESEARCH VARIABLES Parent-Child Relationship (independent variable) Childs Adjustment Inventory (dependent variable) Academic Achievement (dependent variable) The dimensions of parent-child relationship are given below: Protecting Symbolic Punishment Rejecting Object Punishment Demanding Indifferent Symbolic Reward Loving Object Reward Neglecting The dimensions of childs adjustment inventory are given below: Emotional Social Educational 3.08.02 OTHER VARIABLES Gender Medium Type of Schools Type of management of the schools Locality 3.09 TOOLS USED IN THE STUDY The investigator used the following tools in this study Parent child relationship scale (PCRS) Author: Dr.Nalini Rao (1989) Adjustment inventory for school students (AISS) Author: A.K.P.Sinha and R.P. Singh (1993) 3.09.01 PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP, CHILDS ADJUSTMENT INVENTORY AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT To test the hypothesis framed for the present investigation, parent-child relationship scale and childs adjustment inventory has been used to collect information of the high school students. 3.09.02 Description The description of the parent childs relationship is given below: It is a 5 point scale. The tool contains 100 items categorized into 10 dimensions namely, protecting, symbolic punishment, rejecting, object punishment, demanding, indifferent, symbolic reward, loving, object reward and neglecting. Items of the scale are arranged in the same order as the dimensions and they rotate in a cycle through the scale. Each respondent score the tool for both Father and Mother separately. Items are common to both parents. The description of the childs adjustment inventory is given below: It is a 2 point scale. The tool contains 60 items categorized into three dimensions namely, emotional, social and educational. Items of the scale are arranged in the same order as the dimensions and they rotate in a cycle through the scale. 3.09.03 Administration Before administering the test, necessary instructions and directions were given to the students. No time limit is given to the students were asked to complete the inventory as early as possible. 3.09.04 Scoring Procedure Parent child relationship scale (PCRS) Respondents are asked to rate statements as to their own perception of their relationship with either father or mother on a five point scale ranging from Always to very rarely weighted 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 on the scale points. The scale is scored separately for each of the parent thus every respondent obtains ten scores for father form and ten for mother form on the ten dimensions of the scale. Each sub-scale yields a score found by summing the scores of the ratings on each item of the sub-scale. Table 3.1 Dimensions, Item of Number of Parent Child Relationship Scale S.No. Dimensions Item Numbers 1 Protecting 1,11,21,31,41,51,61,71,81,91 2 Symbolic Punishment 2,12,22,32,42,52,62,72,82,92 3 Rejecting 3,13,23,33,43,53,63,73,83,93 4 Object Punishment 4,14,24,34,44,54,64,74,84,94 5 Demanding 5,15,25,35,45,55,65,75,85,95 6 Indifferent 6,16,26,36,46,56,66,76,86,96 7 Symbolic Reward 7,17,27,37,47,57,67,77,87,97 8 Loving 8,18,28,38,48,58,68,78,88,98 9 Object Reward 9,19,29,39,49,59,69,79,89,99 10 Neglecting 10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100 Adjustment inventory for school students (AISS) The questions were to be answered in Yes or No. The use of designer letters A, B and C corresponding to Emotional adjustment, Social adjustment and Educational adjustment enables the test user to discover readily questions relating to each measure. The total score indicates the general adjustment status. Table 3.2 Dimensions, Item of Number of Childs Adjustment Inventory S.No. Dimensions Item Numbers 1 Emotional 1,4,7,10,13,16,19,22,25,28,31,34,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58 2 Social 2,5,8,11,14,17,20,23,26,29,32,35,38,41,44,47,50,53,56,59 3 Educational 3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,39.42,45,48,51,54,57,60 3.10 PILOT STUDY As pilot study was conducted to determine the suitability of the tools used in the present investigation, Random samples of 240 students were selected for the pilot study comparing 80 from Government school, Government-Aided 80 and 80 from Private school, out of which 120 were boys and 120 girls and the reliability and validity were computed. 3.11 ESTABLISHING RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY: The reliability of the parent-child relationship was found out by correlation method and the obtained suitability co-efficient of 0.91 (N = 240) suggest that the parent-child relationship are valuable for using the standardized tools. Table 3.3 CORRELATION: S.No. Dimensions Father Mother Boys Girls Boys Girls 1 Protecting 2 Symbolic Punishment 3 Rejecting 4 Object Punishment 5 Demanding 6 Indifferent 7 Symbolic Reward 8 Loving 9 Object Reward 10 Neglecting 3.12 MAIN STUDY: The validated tool was used for the main study to collect the necessary data; the study was carried out in six schools in Chennai, Kanchipuram and Thiruvallur Districts in Tamil Nadu. In this investigation, the main aim is to study the effects of parent-child relationship on the childs adjustment and academic achievement of high school students. 3.13.01 SELECTION OF THE SAMPLE Random sampling technique has been adopted to choose the samples. Random samples of 1129 students from Standard IX were selected from Chennai, Kanchipuram and Thiruvallur Districts in Tamil Nadu. Table 3.4 Distribution of Sample S.No. Name of the School Government/ Aided/ Private Boys Girls Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 3.13.02 SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION: Table 3.5 TYPES OF SCHOOL BOYS GIRLS TOTAL GOVERNMENT AIDED PRIVATE TOTAL The investigator obtained necessary permission from the principals of the school of education, for collection of data. The willingness and co-operation of the teachers from those institutions was also sought to administer the parent-child relationship, childs adjustment inventory and academic achievement marks. Thus the necessary data were collected during the academic year 2008 2010 from 1129 students of high school covering the whole taluk of Chennai, Kanchipuram and Thiruvallur Districts in Tamil Nadu. 3.15 STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES: Suitable statistical techniques were used to interpret the data to draw out a more meaningful result in the present study in the following statistical measures were used. Descriptive (Mean, Standard Deviation) Differential Analysis (t-test) Relational Analysis (Correlation) Chi-Square 3.16 DELIMITATIONS: The study is confined to high school children (i.e) children between the age group of 13 to 15. The boundary of the sample area is restricted to the Taluk of Chennai, Kanchipuram and Thiruvallur Districts not covering the whole Tamil Nadu. The study is confined to the effects of parent- child relationship. The size of the sample of high school children is restricted to 1129 for the study. 3.17 CONCLUSION: Parent-child relationships undergo important transitions during adolescence, including a decrease in time spent with parents and a shift from dependency to mutual reciprocity. Parents play a significant role in supporting their child with providing secure attachment during these transitions. Adolescents benefit from parental support that encourages autonomy development yet ensures continued monitoring and emotional connectedness. Specific parenting skills that promote attachment security and autonomy development include psychological availability, warmth, active listening, Behaviour monitoring, limit setting, acceptance of individuality, and negotiation rules and responsibilities. Parental support during stressful periods of transition e.g., entry to high school) predicts positive adolescent adjustment Children who have experienced chaotic and inconsistent parenting do not have the experience of regulation to guide their own efforts, nor the confidence in the caregiver (and consequently in themselves) required for self-regulation. Additionally, children who have been pushed to independence at too early age because of their parents emotionally unavailable condition or too strict to tend or to adopt rigid regular strategies, which they attempt to use on their own. They do not learn to turn to parents or others to help them with regulation.

Antipredator Defense as a Limited Resource : Unequal Predation Risk and

INSECTS WITH PARENTAL INSTINCTS More than two centuries ago, a Swedish scientist named Modeer described what appeared to be maternal behavior in the acanthosomatid shield bug Elasmucha grisea. He noted that the female did not fly away when an intruding object threatened her compact egg mass; instead, she remained steadfast and tilted her body towards the object (Tallamy). Unfortunately, this evidence, no matter how well documented, was not enough to convince countless people of the possibility of insects having parental instincts. The acknowledgement of parental behavior in insects was not a widely accepted idea for a number of years. Many people believed insects were too primitive to care for their young and that only when physical conditions became extremely severe were insects capable of expressing paternal abilities. The traditional view of maternal care is that it is an exceptional and relatively recent evolutionary leap forward (Tallamy). Fortunately, the assumptions made about maternal care in insects do not have to be accepted or rejected based only on faith or an educated guess; today it is possible for these predictions to be empirically tested so that the data may be recorded and analyzed. The following experiment is just one example of the various ways in which ideas regarding insects and maternal care may be effectively evaluated. Reginald B. Cocroft, of the Neurobiology and Behavior Department at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, researched insects known as Umbonia crassicornis, or the thornbug treehopper. U. crassicornis offspring thrive in large aggregations on the often exposed stems of host-plants. These offspring are incredibly vulnerable, making them easy targets and subject to intense predatio... ...ymphs unequally. The mother distributed her protection equally throughout the entire aggregation along the length of the branch. Main Points: Location in relation to the mother is possibly competitive Location independent of the mother is possibly competitive, but only exploitation competition Signaling is not competitive for maternal care, it is cooperative and the mother distributes protection along the aggregation equally. WORKS CITED Cocroft, Reginald B. 2002. Antipredator Defense as a Limited Resourse: Unequal Predation Risk and Broods of an Insect With Maternal Care. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 1, 125-133. Tallamy, D. W. and C. Schaefer. 1997. Maternal behavior in the Hemiptera: Ancestry, Alternatives, and Current Adaptive Value. pp. 94-115, In B. Crespi and J. Choe (eds.). Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mirror: Reflections of Truth Essay -- essays research papers fc

â€Å"Mirror†: Reflections of Truth In Sylvia Plath’s poem â€Å"Mirror†, the reader takes a look into the messages presented and compares them with the reflections that are cast in a mirror and images in a lake. When reading this poem, we discover that the speaker is the actual reflection that gives the interpretation of its views. The first interpretation is shown as a mirror on the wall â€Å"I am silver and exact. I have no preconceptions.† (1), second as the water in the lake because she states â€Å"Now I am a lake.† (10), and third through the eyes of an aging woman that is revealed in line 17 â€Å"In me she has drowned a young girl, and in me an old woman/ Rises toward her day after day†¦Ã¢â‚¬  In the first stanza the reflection personifies the ability to take in what it sees without judging stating â€Å"I hav...

Delusions of Grandeur †My Summer in Greece :: Personal Narrative

Delusions of Grandeur – My Summer in Greece It is the lawlessness of Greece that attracts both travelers and outcasts. They arrive on ferry boats with the eagerness of immigrants, drunk with notions of escape and pleasure. This hedonistic lure of the Greek islands is far removed from the academic splendor of mainland Europe. In myth, Greece is a land ruled by the selfish whimsy of the gods, and this climate of self-indulgence blows across the Ionian island of Corfu like a frolicking wind. Teetering, as it does, on the far edge of western civilization, Corfu presents itself as a haven or a refuge, depending on one’s orientation as traveler or derelict. Here, travelers can live out their adolescent fantasies and outcasts can be gods. The playground of these gods, the Mount Olympus of debauchery, spills down the steep east coast of Corfu like a glob of Pepto Bismol—the Pink Palace. I came to the Pink Palace in late May, one of a steady trickle of off-season travelers who had arrived just in time to enjoy the last of the cool nights before the torrent of peak season vacationers, drawn by the summer heat, filled the island to capacity. The last leg of a nine-month solo expedition through Europe, the Pink Palace was my last indulgence in freedom before I flew home to start college. On paper, the resort looked like Paradise—the very brochure seemed saturated with ambrosia. Pictures of gleeful scuba divers, vast cliffs that fell into the Ionian Sea and sunny rooms lured me from the mainland. But the brochure’s utopian promise—†Ideally situated on the sands of Agios Gordios beach, the Palace assures a stay that you’ll never forget†Ã¢â‚¬â€turned out to be, at best, a euphemistic appraisal of the jarring reality that awaited me. The Pink Palace was a glaring twentieth-century smear on an otherwise primitive landscape. At night, the profusion of light and music that came from the resort was as obnoxious and out of place as the sickly pink stucco structure that scarred the green hillside. Self-indulgence came in liquid form at the Pink Palace, with names like Ouzo, Blowjobs, B-52s, Kamikazes, and Alabama Slammers. Having dutifully saturated themselves with the culture of the mainland, my fellow guests now allowed themselves the corporeal pleasure of drunken oblivion.

Leaves of Grass

Walt Whitman was born in 1819 and died in 1892. He has been proclaimed as one of the greatest American poets to ever live. His work has been considered both enlightened and controversial. His work has been well received all over the world and translated into over twenty-five languages. He wrote of American life, including the very dark period of American history, the Civil War or also referred to as the War Between the States. His book of poems, Leaves of Grass, which he self published has become a classic especially in reference to the Civil War. â€Å"Aroused and angry, I thought to beat the alarum, and urge relentless war; But soon my fingers fail’d me, my face droop’d, and I resign’d myself, To sit by the wounded and soothe them, or silently watch the dead.† (Whitman 110) The above quote is the first lines of the poem, Drum Taps by Walt Whitman. It is but many of the poems of Leaves of Grass that Whitman wrote as he agonized over the war as it was written during the beginning of the war. It is hard to always look upon Civil War literature as only that which follows the years after the war ceased. Whitman was an essayist and a journalist as well as a poet. He wrote of the things he saw not only in his hometown but also in what he observed as he followed the war through travels and reading. A conflict of great sadness, the deepest tragedy of the Civil War was the country been torn in two by the differing of opinions of both sides but the war was among Americans, Americans fighting Americans. â€Å"Central to this task is his revaluation of the print medium, which he previously viewed as a barrier between himself and his readers, but which he now figures, in â€Å"As I Ebb'd with the Ocean of Life,† as deconstructing his culture's boundary-oriented notion of embodiment. Whitman does not unequivocally embrace this new model of fluidity, however. Instead, he balances fluidity and difference to illustrate for the reader both â€Å"[t]he desire to lose and the fear of losing the boundary lines in force around . . . sexual definition† (156). The 1867 Leaves of Grass, which incorporates the Civil War volume Drum-Taps ( 1865), extends Whitman's critique of the oedipal system to its patriarchal foundation.† (Maslan 131) It had been suggested that Whitman had fallen into decline after 1865 as if the views of the war and the internal strife of his country seemed to cripple him as a poet. Through all the horror and sadness that he had seen and experienced as if he could not rally himself to write with the same fervor that he did before the war and during it, but it had been such a dramatic experience for anyone at first hand that it is no wonder that his poetic inspiration would have dimmed and waned. â€Å"TO thee, old Cause! Thou peerless, passionate, good cause! Thou stern, remorseless, sweet Idea! Deathless throughout the ages, races, lands! After a strange, sad war—great war for thee, (I think all war through time was really fought, and ever will be really fought, for thee;) These chants for thee—the eternal march of thee.†(Whitman 93) The Leaves of Grass incorporates such a magnitude of emotion and observation that to read each separate poem will leave the reader with the feeling of viewing it themselves but critics have retained that Whitman wrote more to himself, as if in a separate conversation with himself that he seems to be almost uncaring of the way it expresses itself to anyone else. â€Å"'70 in paper 5 in cloth . . .' appears to be a reference to copies of the first edition of Leaves of Grass which was issued in various forms. See Charles E. Feinberg, â€Å"‘Notes on Whitman Collections and Collectors,'† Walt Whitman: A Catalog. The Library of Congress ( Washington, D.C., 1955), pp. xi-xii. Whitman probably noted the sailors' monument in the Brooklyn Cemetery of the Evergreens at the interment of his father who had died 11 July 1855. ‘I see the highlands of Abyssinia' appears in line 14, section 7 of ‘Salut au Monde,' inc. ed., p. 119†. (Whitman 41) A poetic journal; observations in poetic dialogue, as he observes those around him and what the impact of the war has had upon them so that the Leaves of Grass is filled with views of Manhattan and how that part of New York dealt with the northern activity in the war against the south. Whitman was not the only American writer to be disturbed by the post Civil War period as many of them wrote of a country so vastly changed and so still almost in shock of what had happened to it. Whitman was a Northerner but the Southern writers such as Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain). â€Å"This deeply pessimistic, critical view of post-Civil War America was, of course, shared by Mark Twain ( The Gilded Age) and Henry Adams ( Democracy). The moralizing fervor of the passage above seems to echo Thomas Nast's scathing Tweed Ring cartoons, which were appearing in Harper's Weekly at the very time that Whitman was composing Democratic Vistas.† (Abrams 8) Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass has seen many different publishing editions since its first conception in 1867. It has been analyzed and critiqued and praised as one of the great volumes of American poetry. It brings to vivid life for the readers one of the saddest periods of American history, the Civil War and the struggling years that followed that war as a country healed and its people recovered. Works Cited Abrams, Sam, ed. The Neglected Walt Whitman: Vital Texts. 1st ed. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 1993 Maslan, Mark. â€Å"Whitman and his Doubles: Division and Union in Leaves of Grass and Its Critics.† American Literary History 6.1 (1994): 119-139 Thomson, James, and Bertram Dobell. Walt Whitman, the Man and the Poet. London: The Editor, 1910. Whitman, Walt. An 1855-56 Notebook toward the Second Edition of Leaves of Grass. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1959 Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. New York: Modern Library, 1921